In this sense, the computer labs are a place where you can see that it has invested heavily, are spacious, with moderns PC desktops, LCD screens and air conditioning. The different facilities like the computer labs and the photocopying place express different degrees of concern of the facultys authorities. The facilities of my facultys have shown different degrees of development during the last years. Perhaps the road is to accommodate the research process to local communities members interested in the production of knowledge, encouraging the incorporation of different epistemological frameworks in research aimed at the democratization of wealth intervention also provide a space for training. The technology fills a need archeology only scientific, is a means to test the reality and as such, this pattern of use has been and will hegemony in our country that follows the technological trends globally, in this sense, local input is low level of innovation. As a science that is interested in understanding the past, working with the record that is both cultural heritage, so he is not only a source of scientific information, has many components, is of interest of communities linked to it by reasons of identity, ethnic, spiritual, etc.īecause the investigation is working with taxpayer money, with heritage of all, a published guidance is needed in this regard, a draft form to the wider society, the scope of the discipline. This is the way that have left the technical side of archaeological work, in our classes the reflection of these issues is minimal.
In this context, the discussion of methodological aspects of the discipline has been strongly addressed. While this theoretical development responds to different scenarios, within which the empowerment of indigenous groups is a major, archeology has had to respond to the emergence of multiple and frequent social needs that require him to positions and solutions.ĭespite this theoretical concern has led the education of the archeology in my carrer, It has served to visualize the social context of the profession: discipline does not exist in isolation from its social context, responding to needs and its products (knowledge) have effects on society. Within this theoretical reflection, aspects related to the use of technology to archaeological work are totally absent. The theoretical development of Latin American archeology in recent years has led to discussion and visulization systems of colonization and domination of the historical process and archaeological academic discipline, which have generated a variety of forms of exclusion and replication of dominant systems.
0 kommentar(er)
